See current and past issues in our e-shop
Enter e-shop
>ČASOPIS PRO MODERNÍ FILOLOGII 2021 (103) 1
To be or not to be? Or — to not be? Is a Change Taking Place in the Ordering of the Negator not and the Infinitive Marker to?
ABSTRACT (en)
The paper notes that while grammars and other linguistic works assume that not precedes the infinitive marker to in English, one can quite often encounter the reverse ordering, to not. The second section provides an overview of the relevant literature. The third section compares spoken data from the British National Corpus and the Spoken BNC2014, and analyzes the written data from the Corpus of Historical American English, concluding that the frequency of to not (relative to not to) has indeed been rising significantly in recent decades. The fourth section attempts to identify some factors underlying this change, most importantly chunking and potential semantic differentiation. It is suggested that chunking might be an especially important factor affecting the change, but further analysis is needed, relying on more advanced statistical methods.
KEYWORDS (cz)
chunking, kognitivní lingvistika, kolostrukční analýza, konstrukční gramatika, rozdělený infinitiv, syntaktická variace
KEYWORDS (en)
chunking, cognitive linguistics, collostructional analysis, construction grammar, split infinitive, syntactic variation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366591.2021.1.3
SOURCES
BNC: British National Corpus. [cit. 18. 2. 2021].
COCA: Corpus of Contemporary American English. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/ [cit. 18. 2. 2021].
COHA: Corpus of Historical American English. https://www.english-corpora.org/coha/ [cit. 18. 2. 2021].
Spoken BNC2014. [cit. 18. 2. 2021].
Google Ngram Viewer. [cit. 23. 2. 2021].
Burnett, D. (2016): The Idiot Brain. A Neuroscientist Explains What Your Head Is Really Up To. Londýn: Faber & Faber.
Cummins, J. (2020): American Dirt. Londýn: Headline Publishing Group.
Gries, S. Th. (2013): 50-something years of work on collocations. What is or should be next… International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18, 1, s. 137–165.
Imbo, F. (2019): How not to take things personally. TEDxMechelen. https://www.ted.com/talks/frederik_imbo_how_not_to_take_things_personally_mar_2020 [cit. 21. 1. 2021].
Rooney, S. — Birch, A. (2019): Normal People: Episode 2. Dublin: Element Pictures. [cit. 20. 1. 2021].
Specter, M. (2010): The danger of science denial. TED2010. https://www.ted.com/talks/michael_specter_the_danger_of_science_denial?language=en#t-879820 [cit. 20. 1. 2021].
REFERENCES
Aarts, B. (2011): Oxford Modern English Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderwald, L. (2002): Negation in NonStandard British English: Gaps, regularizations and asymmetries. Londýn: Routledge.
Baddeley, A. (2020): Short-term memory. In: A. Baddeley — M. W. Eysenck — M. C. Anderson, Memory. 3. vydání. Londýn: Routledge, s. 41–68.
Berlage, E. (2009): Prepositions and postpositions. In: G. Rohdenburg — J. Schlüter (eds.), One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 130–148.
Biber, D. a kol. (2007): Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Longman.
Blanchette, F. (2015): English Negative Concord, Negative Polarity, and Double Negation. Disertační práce. New York: The City University of New York.
Bybee, J. (2010): Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butterfield, J. (ed.) (2015): Split infinitive. In: Fowler’s Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [cit. 1. 2. 2021].
Carnie, A. (2012): Syntax. A Generative Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
Close, R. A. (1987): Notes on the Split Infinitive. Journal of English Linguistics, 20, 2), s. 217–229.
Davies, M. (2012): Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400-million word corpus of historical American English. Corpora, 7, 2, s. 121–157.
Depraetere, I. — Langford, C. (2020): Advanced English Grammar: A Linguistic Approach. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Déprez, V. (2017): What is Strict Negative Concord? Lessons from French Based Creoles. In: D. Ziegeler — Z. Bao (eds.), Negation and Contact: With special focus on Singapore English. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, s. 81–114.
Diessel, H. (2019): The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Divjak, D. — Caldwell-Harris, C. (2019): Frequency and entrenchment. In: D. Divjak — E. Dąbrowska (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations of Language. Berlín: De Gruyter Mouton, s. 61–86.
Dušková, L. a kol. (2012): Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny. Praha: Academia.
Egan, T. (2008): Non-finite Complementation: A usage-based study of infinitive and -ing clauses in English. Amsterdam / New York: Rodopi.
Fitzmaurice, S. M. (2000): The Great Leveler: The Role of the Spoken Media in Stylistic Shift from the Colloquial to the Conventional. American Speech, 75, 1, s. 54–68.
Fried, M. (2013): Pojem konstrukce v konstrukční gramatice. Časopis pro moderní filologii, 95, 1, s. 9–27.
Gilman, E. W. (ed.) (1989): Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage. Springfield: MerriamWebster. Gonzalez, W. D. W. — Dita, S. N. (2017): Split Infinitives across World Englishes: a corpusbased investigation. Asian Englishes, 20, 3, s. 242–267.
Huddleston, R. (1984): Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, R. — Pullum, G. K. (2002): The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iyeiri, Y. (ed.) (2005): Aspects of English Negation. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Jespersen, O. (1917): Negation in English and Other Languages. Kodaň: Bianco Lunos Bogtrykkeri.
Kato, K. (2001): Not to be or to not be: More on Split Negative Infinitives. American Speech, 76, 3, s. 312–315.
Kaunisto, M. — Rudanko, J. (2019): Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English. Trends Affecting Infinitives and Gerunds. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kim, J.-B. (2000): The Grammar of Negation. A Constraint-Based Approach. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kostadinova, V. (2018): Language prescriptivism: attitudes to usage vs. actual language use in American English. Disertační práce. Leiden: Leiden University.
Lehečková, E. (2017): Využití korpusových metod v popisu češtiny: příklad kolostrukční analýzy. Časopis pro moderní filologii, 99, 2, s. 167–180.
Lorenz, D. — Tizón-Couto, D. (2019): Chunking or predicting — frequency information and reduction in the perception of multi-word sequences. Cognitive Linguistics, 30, 4, s. 751–784.
Love, R. a kol. (2017): The Spoken BNC: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22, 3, s. 319–344.
Mazzon, G. (2014): A History of English Negation. Londýn: Routledge.
Mikulová, M. (2011): Split Infinitive — Corpus Analysis. Bakalářská práce. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
Miller, G. (1956): The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, s. 81–97.
Nasu, N. (2002): Negative infinitives and their implications for phrase structure. Journal of Foreign Studies, 53, 3, s. 123–135.
Newell, A. (1990): Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Newman, E. (2018): In (Do-)Support of Phrasal Auxiliary Movement. Handout k prezentaci z konference OLINCO. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého. Dostupné online z [cit. 1. 2. 2021].
Ouhalla, J. (1990): Sentential negation, relativized minimality and the aspectual status of auxiliaries. The Linguistic Review, 7, 2, s. 183–231.
Perales-Escudero, M. D. (2011): To Split or to Not Split: The Split Infinitive Past and Present. Journal of English Linguistics, 39, 4, s. 313–334.
Poutsma, H. (1923): The Infinitive, the Gerund and the Participles of the English Verb. Gröningen: P. Noordhoff.
Quirk, R. a kol. (1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.
Radford, A. (2009): Analysing English Sentences. A Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rickman, P. — Rudanko, J. (2018): Corpus-Based Studies on Non-Finite Complements in Recent English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rohdenburg, G. — Schlüter, J. (2009): New departures. In: G. Rohdenburg — J. Schlüter (eds.), One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, s. 364–423.
Rudanko, J. (2011): Changes in Complementation in British and American English: Corpus-Based Studies on Non-Finite Complements in Recent English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rudanko, J. (2017): Infinitives and Gerunds in Recent English. Studies on Non-Finite Complements with Data from Large Corpora. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sanders, P. B. (1988): Surface Science, Catalysis and the Split Infinitive. Applied Catalysis, 42, 1, s. 194.
Seldon, T. M. (1963): Prepositions and split infinitives! Anesthesia & Analgesia, 42, 5, s. 550.
Schabes, G. A. (1994): A Divided Opinion About Split Infinitives. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 52, 11, s. 1231.
Stefanowitsch, A. — Gries, S. Th. (2003): Collostructions: Investigation the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 2, s. 209–243.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. — Tottie, G. — van der Wurff, W. (eds.) (1999): Negation in the History of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wallage, P. W. (2017): Negation in Early English: Grammatical and Functional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
