2025.1.5

>ČASOPIS PRO MODERNÍ FILOLOGII 2025 (107) 1

Slabiny velkých typologických databází

Limitations of Large Typological Databases

Vít Ulman

 

 FULL TEXT   

 ABSTRACT (en)

This paper focuses on the Grambank database, a large and relatively new typological database. Like others, Grambank has many advantages (e.g. easy access to a large amount of data), but also weaknesses. Particular attention will be paid to errors related to the data itself and its processing. These errors can be broadly divided into two groups: factual errors, mostly caused by incorrect interpretation of the source, and problems of an interpretative nature, where different data processors interpreted the source material in different ways. Using our own research, we will demonstrate, referring to the cases of Northeast Asian languages (mainly Japanese-Ryukyu, Tungusic, Korean, Mongolian, and Chinese), how problematic the extent of distorted data can be, especially in the case of less well-described varieties (various Ryukyu varieties and smaller Tungusic languages). This paper shows that there are entire language families about which the database provides an inaccurate picture. The above-mentioned problems are illustrated using specific examples of linguistic phe nomena for which Grambank contains problematic data, namely the position of numerals in relation to the noun, the presence of ideophones, and evidentiality.

 KEYWORDS (cz)

typologie, Grambank, morfosyntax, severovýchodní Asie, chybná data

 KEYWORDS (en)

linguistic typology, Grambank, morphosyntax, Northeast Asia, faulty data

 DOI

https://doi.org/10.14712/23366591.2025.1.5

 LITERATURE

Dingemanse, M. (2012): Advances in the cross‐ linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics compass 6/10, s. 654–672.

Dryer, M. — Haspelmath, M. (eds.) (2013): WALS Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Dostupné online na adrese: https://wals.info. (poslední přístup: 10. 10. 2024)

Hayashi, Y. (2010): In: M. Shimoji — T. Pellard (eds.), An introduction to Ryukyuan languages. Tokio: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.

Hinds, J. (1986): Japanese. (Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars.) Londýn: Croom Helm.

Chung, K. (2020): Korean Evidentials and Epistemic Modals. In: Evidentials and Modals. Leiden: Brill, s. 177–213.

Nikolaeva, I., — Tolskaya, M. (2011): A Grammar of Udihe. Berlín, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.

Oberfalzerová, A. (2009): Onomatopoeia and iconopoeia — as an expressive means in Mongolian. Mongolo-Tibetica Pragensia, 2, 1, s. 29–60.

Plank, F. (2009): WALS values evaluated. Linguistic Typology, 13, 1, s. 41–75.

Shimoji, M. (2008): A grammar of Irabu, a Southern Ryukyuan language. (Disertační práce). Canberra: Australian National University.

Skirgård, H. a kol. (2023): Grambank (v1.0.3). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Dostupné online na adrese: grambank.clld.org (poslední přístup: 12. 1. 2025)

Sohn, H. (1999): The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ulman, V. (2024): Morphosyntactic Properties of Ideophones in the Languages of Central and Northeast Asia. International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics, 6.1, s. 145–171.

Van Hoey, T. — Thompson, A. L. (2020): The Chinese ideophone database (CHIDEOD). Cahiers de linguistique Asie orientale, 49(2), s. 136–167.

Zikmundová, V. — Křivan, J. — Ulman, V. — Kapišovská, V. (v přípravě): The role of ideophones in Khalkha Mongolian motion descriptions. Cognitive semantics.

Úvod > 2025.1.5