2023.1.5

>ČASOPIS PRO MODERNÍ FILOLOGII 2023 (105) 1

Španělská modální slovesa z perspektivy R. W. Langackera: otázka konceptualizátora

Modal Verbs in Spanish from a Langackerian Perspective: the Conceptualizers

Adéla Smažíková

 

 FULL TEXT   

 ABSTRACT (en)

This article presents the problem of modal verbs in Spanish from the perspective of Langacker’s cognitive grammar. Langacker defines modal verbs as grounding elements that can express implicit meanings and thus increase the degree of subjectivity of the utterance. Unlike English modal verbs, which are completely unanchored and fully grammaticalized, Spanish modal verbs exhibit verb inflection. The aim of this article is to compare the construals with and without a modal verb and to point out the differences between the positions of conceptualizers (speaker and addressee). For these purposes several graphical representations are proposed throughout the article. As the proposed schemes show, the position of conceptualizers plays a key role in the conception of any construal. It is concluded that a construal with a modal verb has a more subjectively anchored interaction between the two conceptualizers and that the speaker is always a completely implicit part of the utterance.

 KEYWORDS (cs)

kognitivní lingvistika, modální slovesa, subjektivita, ground, španělština

 KEYWORDS (en)

cognitive linguistics, modal verbs, subjectivity, ground, Spanish

 DOI

https://doi.org/10.14712/23366591.2023.1.5

 REFERENCES

Achard, M. (1998): Representation of cognitive structures. Syntax and semantics of French sentential complements. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Cornillie, B. (2005): On modal grounding, reference points, and subjectification: The case of the Spanish epistemic modals. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, s. 56–77.

Cornillie, B. (2006): Conceptual and constructional considerations on the subjectivity of English and Spanish modals. In: A. Athanasiadou (ed.) et al., Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity (Cognitive Linguistics Research). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, s. 177–208.

Cornillie, B. (2007): Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Spanish (Semi-)Auxiliaries: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin — New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Danaher, D. S. (2007): Úvod do kognitivní gramatiky (KG). In: L. Saicová Římalová, Čítanka textů z kognitivní lingvistiky II. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta, s. 89–103.

Kratochvílová, D. (2019): The Spanish future tense and cognitive perspective: Tense, modality, evidentiality and the reflection of the grounding process. Lingua, 230, art. n. 102713.

Kratochvílová, D. (2022): The Spanish Conditional (with Reference to English and Czech): A Contrastive Cognitive Approach. Praha: Karolinum.

Langacker, R. W. (1987): Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (1991): Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (2002): Deixis and subjectivity. In: F. Brisard (eds.), Grounding: The epistemic footing of deixis and reference. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, s. 1–28.

Langacker, R. W. (2006): Subjectification, grammaticization, and conceptual archetypes. In: A. Athanasiadou (ed.) et al., Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity (Cognitive Linguistics Research). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, s. 17–40.

Langacker, R. W. (2008): Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (2009): Investigations in cognitive grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Cognitive linguistics research.

Pelyvás, P. (2006): Subjectification in (expressions of) epistemic modality and the development of the grounding predication. In: A. Athanasiadou (ed.) et al., Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity (Cognitive Linguistics Research). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, s. 121–150.

Pelyvás, P. (2019): On epistemic and deontic grounding. Argumentum, 15, s. 304–315.

Smažíková, A. (2022): Los verbos modales en español desde la perspectiva langackeriana. Studia Romanistica, 22, 2, s. 61–72.

Úvod > 2023.1.5