2023.1.1

>ČASOPIS PRO MODERNÍ FILOLOGII 2023 (105) 1

Mediální konstrukce v češtině a v italštině

Middle Constructions in Czech and Italian

Anna Maria Perissutti

 

 FULL TEXT   

 ABSTRACT (en)

The paper is devoted to a family of constructions in Czech and Italian that are reminiscent of the verbal category of Indo-European Middle, which, besides the active voice, was the second voice and expressed agency/state as subjective. As far as Czech is concerned, we consider two constructions, one with intransitive verbs, the morpheme “se”, the adverb of evaluation and the Experiencer expressed in the dative, and one with transitive verbs, the so-called mediopassive, with the Patient in subject position as in the passive sentences. As far as Italian is concerned, we also analyze two constructions, one with intransitive verbs and the combined clitics “se+ne” and one with transitive verbs and the adverb of evaluation “facilmente”. Based on data derived from the Czech Ten Ten 2017 corpus, as well as the Italian web 2020 corpus from the Sketch Engine platform, we analyze the actional nature of the verbs occurring in the sentences, while contrasting the functions of the constructions in the two languages in the framework of construction grammar (Goldberg, 1995).

 KEYWORDS (cz)

medium, mediopasivní, konstrukční gramatika, čeština, italština

 KEYWORDS (en)

middle, mediopassive, construction grammar, Czech, Italian

 DOI

https://doi.org/10.14712/23366591.2023.1.1

 REFERENCES

Biskup, P. (2017): TELIČNOST. In: P. Karlík — M. Nekula — J. Pleskalová (eds.): CzechEncy — Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. URL: https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/TELIČNOST (poslední přístup: 7. 5. 2023)

Cinque, G. (1988): On si Constructions and the Theory of Arb. Linguistic inquiry, 19, 4, s. 521–581.

Croft, W. (2001): Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford Academic Press.

D’Alessandro, R. (2007): Impersonal „si“ constructions. Agreement and Interpretation. Berlin/New York — Mouton de Gruyter.

Daneš, F. (1971): Pokus o strukturní analýzu slovesných významů. Slovo a slovesnost, 32, s. 193–207.

Fried, M. (2005): Constructing grammatical meaning: isomorphism and polysemy in Czech reflexivization. Studies in Language, 16, 3, s. 475–512.

Goldberg, A. (1995): Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jezek, E. (2003): Classi di verbi tra semantica e sintassi. Pisa: ETS.

Jezek, E. (2005): Interazioni tra aspetto e diatesi nei verbi pronominali italiani. Studi di grammatica italiana, 23, s. 239–281.

Kemmer, S. (1993): Middle voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Kořenský, J. (1971): K problému větněsémantických funkcí nedějových významů českého slovesa. Slovo a slovesnost, 32, s. 208–216.

Lo Cascio, V. (1970): Strutture pronominali e verbali italiane. Bologna — Zanichelli.

Lo Cascio, V. — Jezek, E. (1999): ThematicRole Assignment and Aspect in Italian Pronominal Verbs. A lexicological study. In: L. Mereu (eds.), Boundaries of Morphology and Syntax. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 180]. Amsterdam — John Benjamins, s. 253–269.

Maienborn, C. (2007): On Davidsonian and Kimian States. In: I. Comorovski — K. von Heusinger (eds.), Existence: Syntax and Semantics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, s. 107–130.

Masini, F. (2005): Multi-word expressions between syntax and the lexicon: the case of Italian verb-particle constructions. Sky Journal of Linguistics, 18, s. 145–173.

Masini, F. (2008): Costruzioni verbopronominali „intensive“ in italiano. In: P. M. Bertinetto et alii (eds.), Atti del XLII Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI). Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore (25–27 settembre 2008).

Medová, L. (2009): Reflexive Clitics in the Slavic and Romance Languages. A Comparative View from an Antipassive Perspective. PhD. Dissertation. Princeton: Princeton University.

Panevová, J. — Karlík, P. (2018): Reflexivní sloveso. In: P. Karlík — M. Nekula — J. Pleskalová (eds.), Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny, s. 1536–1541.

Perissutti, A. M. (2021): I verbi stativi nella costruzione media in ceco. In: E. Gherbezza — V. Laskova — A. M. Perissutti (eds.), Le lingue slave: sviluppi teorici e prospettive applicative. Atti dell’VIII Incontro di linguistica slava (Udine, 10–12 settembre 2020). Roma: Aracne, s. 343–364.

Perissutti, A. M. (2022): Classi di verbi cechi tra semantica e sintassi. Azionalità e aspetto verbale in un modello semantico scalare. Roma: Aracne.

Rivero, M. L. — Arregui, A. (2012): Building Involuntary States in Slavic. In: V. Demonte — L. McNally (eds.), Telicity, Change and State. A Cross-categorial View of Event Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, s. 300–332.

Rohlfs, G. (1969): Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, Volume 2. Torino — Einaudi.

Russi, C. (2006): Morphosyntactic functions of Italian reflexive si. In: D. Arteaga — R. Gess (eds.), Historical Romance Linguistics: Retrospectives and perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, s. 357–374.

Simone, R. (1993): Stabilità e instabilità nei caratteri originali dell’italiano. In: Sobrero, A. (ed.), Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo. Le strutture. Roma/Bari: Laterza, s. 41–100.

Vendler, Z. (1957): Verbs and Times. The pHilosophical Review, 66, 2, s. 143–160.

Wierzbicka, A. (1988): The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Úvod > 2023.1.1